An IM conversation with a friend whose taste gravitates toward the Romantic Sublime. We usually disagree on aesthetics, but in this conversation.....
*************
Me: So I had a Romantic moment the other day.
Friend: Good. I am glad to hear that your soul isn't completely dead. :p
Me: My soul is silly.
Me: So I hide it most of the time.
Me: But every once in a while, it emerges.
Friend: So what was this Romantic moment?
Me: It snowed on Friday. I walked home in the snow. Everything was so still and peaceful and calm and expansive and I wondered how there could be so much beauty.
Me: And then my hair sparkled.
Me: From the snow.
Friend: !
Friend: You are a poet!
Me: ?
Friend: Those are things that poets would notice, that's all.
Friend: But you probably convinced yourself that it was all meaningless and illusion and went home and listened to Cage. I know how you are.
Me: Well. Er. Yeah. It just seems rather silly to say stuff like that.
Friend: Perhaps because words can't adequately describe it.
Me: Yes and no.
Me: Poetry has remained popular for a reason....
And so forth...a rambling conversation on the difference between 20th century poetry and Byron....word play, imagery, etc.
********************
Is there a disjunct between words and feelings? Are words really inadequate to describe ourselves? Perhaps because of the fall and even Babel, we can't correlate our words and world perfectly any more. And yet, I sometimes wonder if I am only experiencing "the sublime" because the poets tell me I should feel a certain way. If I had never read poetry, would I ever feel anything? And is feeling really connected to the soul, anyway? Hmmm. I probably ought to undergo some Therapy for Those Overly Analytical Persons Who Can't Just Enjoy the World without Wondering Why. Maybe this is why I don't describe my feelings that often. They get lost somewhere in the shuffle.
**********************
A treasured compliment I have received was "Sarah, you look like Geniveve," given once when I was wearing flowers in my hair.
Flowers in my hair.
Ribbons down my back.
And the desire to be beautiful.
All there. I confess.
On the one hand, this seems sentimental and silly. On the other hand, Romantic. I realize that in this extended entry I have wandered a bit, conflating Romantic with romantic, the sublime with the concrete. But I believe that they feed off each other and ultimately , as C.S. Lewis might say, are to be found in Christ. And yet, the symbols, though lesser, can bring great joy.
All things hold together in Him.
This was a bit oblique. I'm not sure exactly what you're driving at. But yes, I believe that words are inadequate to express ourselves. That's why I love them so much - straining and stretching for what little connection we have.
Posted by: Evan Donovan at 28.11.05 13:57Blogs are a curious phenomenon. Does one tailor one's entries for public readibility or can she create what might only make sense to herself? Or can she do both? At any rate, you did find my main point, which I approached from three angles: the issue as it was brought up in dialogue, the philosophical "objectively clear" questions raised by the issue, and the subjective, obscure, vaguely related sense impressions that might evolve out of the issue. I guess I was trying to achieve some sort of gestalt effect rather than a linear progression. Each of the sections tells the same story [the struggle to use words in order to truly describe feelings, or what I term The Romantic Rift (between words and world)], but in a slightly different way.
Posted by: funke at 29.11.05 8:06