A classmate in my Celebrity class asked that question last week. And honestly, none of us could think of any examples. Unless of course, you want to go with James Bond's flings with the "locals" of various regions he's been. But that's hardly a real relationship. And so it makes me wonder how far we've really come since Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?
And speaking of Guess Who's Coming to Dinner? and racial relations, I went to the library today and found Patch of Blue on the shelves. Sidney Poitier is perhaps one of my favorite actors (although, when I say "favorite," this does not mean that I have seen every single one of his films or read biographies of his life or watched documentaries, etc. or etc. I just happen to like what I've seen him do). His ground-breaking films are always idealistic: what the world should be like, perhaps what we wish it could be. Polished, educated, honorable, middle class: Sidney Poitier blurred the colour line (even as he starred in films that explored it--is it any wonder that several of them are shot in black-and-white?) and demonstrated that African Americans* were just human. Or did he?
Some might argue that the only thing human about Sidney Poitier's characters was their skin. "Humanity" does not equal white middle class culture, yet these films seem to suggest that such is the case. Instead of supporting the achievements of the "race," Poitier's characters seem to have left it behind. Instead of listening to Ellington, Coltrane, or Davis on his phonograph, the character Gordon Ralfe in Patch of Blue keeps records of Strauss and knows how to sing in French (signs of white culture and education). You could accuse Poitier of selling out.
But I like the disconnect. It keeps the lines between what counts as "black" and "white" fuzzy. I don't know. These are just thoughts kicking around in my head before I attend the African Drum Summit concert for my world music concert. I guess I've also been thinking more about it because I'm hoping to present a paper on Porgy and Bess (if my abstract is accepted) which explores the same issues regarding what "counts" as "black" and what "counts" as "white." Porgy and Bess gets dragged over the coals for being "too white" or "too Jewish" (Gershwin was Jewish) but definitely not "real" black. And though Anne Brown (the original Bess) was a classically trained singer, people wanted her to sing spirituals. She wanted to sing Schubert. How "authentic" is that? To say, you're only doing black music if you've got the gravel in your voice?
*Interestingly enough, while whites can (and have in the past) played blacks, blacks are almost always cast racially: Not that Zoolander is the fount of all social knowledge, but the following clips from the extended features (which includes a "fake" interview between Derek Zoolander and Ben Stiller as the actor) does say something:
Zoolander: My second choice for the role [of Zoolander] was Will Smith.
Stiller: Um, Derek. Will Smith is black.
Zoolander: What? You got a problem with that??
Actually--I have seen one, on the short-lived but really, really cool show Firefly, Zoe and Wash. I don't think race is ever brought up in the series. And I read a nifty article about it discussing the way the show portrays their marriage as an adult marriage, loving but with real and sometimes unresolved conflicts, not as the typical soap-opera-ish coupling frequently shown on TV.
Posted by: Jo at 30.09.06 19:56I'll have to check Firefly out! Thanks, Joanna!
Posted by: funke at 1.10.06 8:53Hey Jo, I was thinking of the same example! Perhaps the fact that _Firefly_ takes place in the future is significant: it would be difficult to present a drama about a mixed-race couple, set in contemporary times, which didn't at least nod to the existence of racial/cultural differences. It would feel like the drama was incomplete--that it was intentionally ignoring an issue the couple would have had to address in some situations (if not with their own prejudices, then those of other people). Since _Firefly_ takes place within a different cultural milieu, it's easier to imagine racial differences have shifted in importance.
Posted by: Leopoldtulip at 1.10.06 18:14Leopoldtulip: I've seen you comment on Jeannette's and Joanna's blogs, but I don't think I know you. Are you yet another one of those Covenant grads I just barely missed but would probably have loved to have known?
Posted by: funke at 1.10.06 23:22Yes, he is one of those Covenant grads you just barely missed and would loved to have known. The kind you would have sat down with in the Great Hall with a group of friends and talked about philosophy, theology, your favorite books, all punctuated by an endless stream of witty puns. And your table would still be laughing and conversing long after everyone else had left...
Posted by: Joanna at 2.10.06 10:54Thanks for the kind words. Technically speaking, Leopoldtulip's origins are shrouded in mystery, because his secret identity hopes to get an academic job that offers him tenure one day. However, there have been unconfirmed reports of Leopoldtulip sightings in the Great Hall.
Funke, we've never met, but I've greatly enjoyed your posts.
Posted by: Leopoldtulip at 2.10.06 11:39ha! The only reason I clicked on the comments was to mention Wash and Zoe. Nice. :-)
Posted by: Aidje at 15.11.06 14:55